|
Polymathica Refined.. Erudite.. Visionary © 2010 The Institute for Advanced
Social and Technological Analysis, LLC |
|
|
Polymathica TV Soon, radio and
television will move to the Internet. Actually, to a limited degree, it
already has. This will be good news for most people, but really great news
for Polymathica Members. It means that refined, erudite television
programming will become economically viable and, therefore, available in
large doses, 24/7. It also means that a whole new community of producers of
refined, erudite television will emerge. What is astounding is how completely
Internet television and specifically Polymathica television will change the
economic dynamics of the industry. Today, television programming requires
massive audiences in order to survive. USA Network’s The Starter Wife was
canceled due to poor ratings despite routinely attracting audiences of 2.5
million. Consequently, when new show concepts are considered, appeal to large
audiences is never far from the producers’ thoughts. Internet television, however, can survive
on 100,000 viewers or less. It never
competes for a time slot. It only
competes against profitability. The current Internet
delivered television is generally presented at no cost with limited
commercial interruption through websites such as Hulu.com. This is possible, however, because
producers are viewing Internet delivery as an ‘add on’. When it becomes the primary delivery
channel, shows cannot be profitable without increasing advertising content to
a degree similar to current broadcast, cable and satellite presentations. We believe that commercial free pay per
view will become the norm for specialized content such as Polymathica
TV. Mainstream, network produced
television has total advertising of about $.80 per hour. The typical one hour television show is
approximately 42 minutes of programming and 18 minutes of advertising. The simple calculation of 60/18 *$.80 shows
that people are paying themselves $2.67 per hour to watch commercials. If two people are watching, they are paying
themselves just half that. Certainly,
with the affluence that Polymathica television watchers will experience
during the Information Age income explosiion, it will be better to simply pay
the $.80 per hour and be done with it. We predict that the
upper quartile of households will have incomes increasing to over $300K per
year within the next twenty years.
Polymathical subscribers and certainly Fellows will achieve these
income levels sooner. Because of this
Polymathica TV will be able to profitably offer even more highly targeted programs
with download costs of $2.00 per hour or higher. Elite Traveler Magazine is an ultra upscale
magazine with the tagline, ‘The Private Jet Lifestyle Magazine.’ It costs $24.50 per issue. It will almost surely find its counterpart
in download television with pay per view costs perhaps as high as
$10.00.
The critical
difference between the old and the new is that broadcast, cable and satellite
Networks have a limited number of time slots to fill. If, in the experience of
the Network, the performance of a show is below the potential for the time
slot, they will cancel the show, even if the producers are making a profit.
Polymathica Television, however, will have no such limitation. It will
present all the television programming that proves profitable to the
producers. Polymathica members
and subscribers currently tend to watch less television that the average
person. However, with the introduction
of more appropriate programs, we believe that the average Polymathica subscriber
may acquire ten hours per week of content.
That equates to 25 million viewer-hours per week. However, similar to Polymathica radio, we
expect that signficantly more Polymathica programming will be exported than
the amount of mass audience programming that will be imported. Consequently, in total, we would expect
that at market maturity, the net programming export may double the effective
viewership to approximately 50 million viewer-hours per week. Assuming an average viewership of
approximately 400K, this will enable a programming selection equivalent to
approximately six traditional Networks.
In that sense, Polymathica.com and Internet television will usher in a
golden age of refined, erudite television. A typical Polymathica
television show will have gross revenue of $2.00 X 400K viewers per episode X
26 annual episodes =
$20.8 million per year.
Traffic acquisition, billing and administration will take $4.16
million, resulting in a net revenue to the producers
of $16.64 million per year. A 10%
margin will result in an income for the Producer of $1.664 million per
year. On one hand, the Producer may
have more than one show in production.
On the other hand, some functions, such as writing, directing and
editing, may be also be undertaken by Polymathica Fellows. It is, therefore, difficult to determine
how many Fellows will be involved in Polymathica TV. However, it would appear that it will be at
least 500 Fellows and incomes should exceed $1.0 million per year. As home televisions increase
in size and quality, the line between movies and television series will begin
to blur. In many ways, the
process will not be signficantly different than traditional television and
movie industries. The Polymath will
form a production company. Concepts
will be pitched to investors who will finance the project through an
LLP. A Pilot will be produced and made
available through the Internet. If
successful, the LLP will receive expanded funding and the television show
will be produced in ‘seasons’ of X episodes.
The Producer will receive a ‘promote’ on the LLP that may result in
annual income from 300K to 1,000K per year, depending upon the level of
success. The Producer can receive
additional income if he or she takes a major role in directing or writing. We expect that there
will be proportionately fewer sitcoms and reality shows and proportionately
more dramedies and documentaries than on mainstream television. We expect a rebirth on Polymathica of
mini-series. We anticipate that
production will concentrate one or more geographic areas for the sake of
access to talent base. We would not
expect it to be in Hollywood, since it is attempting to differentiate itself
from the mainstream television and movie industries. |
|
|
|
|