|
Polymathica Refined.. Erudite.. Visionary © 2010 The Institute for Advanced
Social and Technological Analysis, LLC |
|
|
NOTE: Nothing in this article should be construed
as an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any security. This article describes methods of
capitalization and is not to be interpreted as legal advice. Prior to offering securities for sale,
either publicly or privately, qualified legal counsel should be engaged. Capitalizing the Information Age A
great Transformation is upon us.
Future historians will identify the period from 2010 to 2030 as the
heart of the Information Revolution.
During this time, nearly all institutions, that
heretofore have undergone moderate change, will be eradicated and
replaced by Information Age institutions.
The geopolitical and socioeconomic structures of civilization twenty
years from now will be nearly unrecognizable.
Those who understand the likely outcomes stand to profit economically,
politically, professionally and socially.
Here we consider the implications of the Transformation as it applies
to the capitalization of the many enterprises it will spawn. Through
The Future 101, the Polymathica Institute has a compelling story to tell
about The Transformation. Through the
Institute, the Fellows of Polymathica will tell this story professionally to
their collective benefit. However, it
must be told carefully. A superior
knowledge of futurity can only exist within the context of a generally
inferior knowledge of futurity. So, we
will tell the story. But in general terms, to all who will listen. However, we will discuss the details and
specifics only within the Fellowship of the Polymathica Institute, itself. Those
individuals of intelligence, drive and vision who aggressively engage the
Transformation and the opportunities it will present can expect to join the
ranks of a new Information age elite with characteristic incomes in excess of
$500K per year. However, those who
ponder, muse, mull and/or dither will be left behind. Those risk takers with a bias toward action
will reap the benefits. One of the
important chapters in the story is an explanation of how ideas will turn into
enterprises in the Information Age. A General Plan for Bootstrapping Ventures Suppose
a person wants to capitalize a project.
The Polymathica Institute and The Future 101 will provide the
opportunities for many such projects.
Parenthetically, we will be discussing this within the context of a An
initial small and very private offering will provide the liquidity necessary
for a Regulation A or Regulation D offering of larger size. While laws and regulations vary from state
to state and among the various types of offerings, it is generally more
difficult to raise funds when the amount being
raised is more than ten times the existing capitalization. In some circumstances it is not
allowed. However, even if it is
allowed, the new investors also will want the founders to have some ‘skin in
the game.’ Capitalization
can be increased legitimately through the fruits of sweat equity. For example, an e-mail list can
legitimately have a market value of $1.00 per name or more. A Real Estate project may have plans,
drawings, etc. that can be capitalized at prevailing cost to produce. There are well established costs to website
design that can be undertaken by a founder and then contributed in exchange
for stock. Creativity in this realm is
a valuable contributor to success.
Remember, the more the substantial capital of the enterprise, the more
that can be raised or the less that will need to be sold to raise the
required capital. In
the Generally
speaking, you will need to acquire a minimum of $1,000 in cash and accumulate
intangible assets from each founding investor in order to meet the
requirements of the first step. Every
person who joins the group should be asked whether they qualify as an accredited
investor. You will probably be
surprised that many of them do qualify.
If they sign a certification, they will not count against the 35
person limit. This will improve your
chances of success, first because you can raise capital from more people and
secondly because they will likely be useful on second and third rounds of
financing. Up
until the time that you actually offer securities privately within the group,
you may ask people to leave if they do not appear to be sufficiently
interested and invite new people in.
As a general rule, you should never have more than 150 people in the
group and you should stop adding people once offerings commence. The reason for this is to assure that any
offering will be considered a private offering. However, once you are ready to incorporate
and offer securities for sale, you should immediately engage legal counsel
with securities experience. Your legal
counsel may require you to approach each member individually. This, however, makes good marketing sense
as well. Let
us assume now that you have completed the above and have a corporate bank
account with a $50K balance and an additional $50K of contributed sweat
equity assets. You are prepared to
undertake a Reg A or Reg D Direct Public Offering for up to $1,000,000. However, having the funds to cover the
legal and registration fees is somewhat different than having a pool of
people willing to invest $1,000,000.
In order to accomplish this, a realistic capitalization strategy must
be prepared. Actually, it should be
prepared before incorporating and collecting funds and assets. Before
we continue discussing the process of offerings, we should discuss the very
important concepts of valuation.
Suppose an entrepreneur brings $10K of assets to the table and issues
himself 500 shares. Then, suppose 35
founding investors bring $1,000 each and receive 500 shares. The total capital of the company is $45K
and consequently, every share has a book value of $45. In other words, the entrepreneur has 500
shares X $45 = $22,500 for which he paid only $10,000. The founding investors have 500 X $45 =
$22,500 for which they paid $35,000.
They have lost about 35.6% of their investment. This is due to a “promote” by the
entrepreneur and is normal. However,
suppose the group now raises $1,000,000 for which they issue 1,000
shares. The stock price is now
$1,045,000/2,000= $522.50 per share.
The entrepreneur is now worth 500 X 522.50 = 261,250. However, the founding shareholders now have
stock worth $261,250 for which they paid $45,000 for a 581%
appreciation. The second round
investors paid $1,000,000 for stock now worth $522,500 and lost 47.7% of
their investment. They essentially
enriched the original stockholder for ‘getting on board first.’ The
above is possible because Economic Value of a company is often greater than
the Stockholders’ Equity on the Balance Sheet. Suppose in the above example, the risk
adjusted expectation of the Economic Value of the company five years from now
is $100,000,000 with no more equity infusions. The second round investors have 50% of the company,
so their portion is $50,000,000 or a fifty-fold increase in their investment
over five years. That equates to more
than a doubling of their investment each year, which will motivate most
investors. Basically, the original
investors, by funding the start-up have improved the probability of success
and therefore increased the risk adjusted expectation. They are, in essence, being rewarded for
their vision. This
is normal. Each round of financing
pays more per share, diluting their investment and enriching the investment
of those who came before them. Because
of this, in most private placements the early round investors are restricted
from selling their stock for two years.
This is intended to dissuade middle round investors from profiting
from the dilution alone at the expense of later round purchasers. The Investors’ Lounge Once
you have qualified for an offering, most likely a Regulation D, Rule 504,
Form U-7 Imagine that you go out to find investors to finance a
Polymathica entertainment venture. The
first prospective investor you find is interested in Real Estate Development
deals. The next invests in high tech
Internet start-ups. The next invests
in medical technologies. Because you
are working on an entertainment deal, you have found three people interested
in investing in start-ups - just not yours.
Now, there are real estate development entrepreneurs, Internet start-ups
and medical technology start-ups going through exactly the same process as
you and experiencing exactly the same problem. Furthermore, each of you has an educational
process that includes both general information about the future of your
industry and specific information about your particular opportunity. Clearly, there is a benefit to pooling the
funding efforts of all the Polymathica enterprises. Additionally, there is a clear benefit to
the risk tolerant investor, once they understand the future described in The
Future 101, to have direct access to all entrepreneurs who are attempting to
capitalize upon the opportunities of the emerging Information Age
civilization. In the Industrial Age, the relationship between entrepreneur and
investor was generally mediated by an Investment Banker who introduced the
two parties for a fee. In small
offerings, the Investment Banker typically took between 5% and 10%. A million dollar offering, in addition to
the $50K to $100K of offering expenses may have had as much as another $100K
of commissions. With the Investors’
Lounge the relationship between entrepreneur is more
direct. The entrepreneur may wish to
pursue endorsements and the investor may want professional advice, but
generally, they are free to engage one another directly, allowing a larger
share of proceeds directed to the enterprise, not funds acquisition. For a visionary and risk tolerant investors, Fellowship is
bargain. It will allow them to immerse
themselves in a central node of Informatin Age transformation. As enterprises mature and net worths
increase, the amount available for investment will grow – slowly at first,
but as with exponential growth, dramatically over time. The Investors’ Lounge will have moderators
who will be both knowledgeable Polymaths and competent New Ventures Analysts.
Taken in total, it is far more cost
effective, with a much greater probability that good projects will get
funded. |
|
|
|
|